Thriving Thriving JavaScript JS HTML HT
↑ 48
jichang hm4reggggg/jichang

2026 latest stable airport recommendations. Self-used, not advertising. A well-established proxy service running for 3+ years. Homepage: airforceone.top. Fully compatible with multi-platform clients such as Shadowrocket, FLclash and Clash. Offers three types: unlimited-traffic plans that don't reset, low-price high-traffic value plans, and highly available multi-node stable plans. Also shares beginner client setup tutorials and technical guides for each platform.

https://airforceone.top/ ↗
HEALTH 90 / Healthy
// solo builder fanqiangjichangvpnanytlsclashclash-vergeflclashhysteria2shadowrocketshadowrocket-app

// readme

🌐 Sharing self-used stable airport recommendations. Check from time to time whether they can still be opened

📢 iOS beginner tutorial and pitfall guide:

If you’re new to iPhone, you may find that Shadowrocket can’t be downloaded directly from the China App Store, which puts you in an awkward loop: you need Shadowrocket to get past the firewall on your phone, but you need to get past the firewall to download Shadowrocket.

In fact, as long as your computer can get past the firewall normally, you can easily break this deadlock. Below is the most easy-to-understand illustrated solution:

👉 Click to view: 2026 guide to getting past the firewall on Apple phones without Shadowrocket

💡 The following are all airports I use personally. I’ve been using them for about 3 years now, and overall they’re pretty good.:

📌 Quick overview of the three airport types

  • No reset: One of the few airports whose traffic doesn’t reset. You’re charged for what you use, which suits friends who use it lightly and worry about wasting traffic when plans expire.
  • High traffic: Large traffic allowance with good…
↑ The Undervalued Score +

How much a project earns versus how much attention it actually gets. Above 50 means the work is outrunning its audience. Recomputed nightly from commit velocity, contributor effort, issue resolution, fork utility, release cadence, and project maturity — divided by a logarithmic reach factor.

score  = signal / reach

signal = 0.25·commit_velocity   // commits in last 90 days (cap 30)
       + 0.20·contributor_work  // unique authors × velocity (cap 100)
       + 0.20·issue_resolution  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·fork_ratio        // forks ÷ stars (proxy for real usage)
       + 0.10·release_cadence   // releases in 90 days (cap 3)
       + age_bonus              // +0 to +0.30 after 6 months
       + homepage_bonus         // +0.05 if homepage is set

reach  = log₁₀(stars + watchers + 10)█
♥ The Health Score +

Is the project alive and maintained right now? A 0–100 pulse recomputed nightly from commit recency, rhythm, how fast issues close, and how quickly PRs get merged.

health = 0.35·recency       // days since last commit (90d decay)
       + 0.25·cadence       // commit rhythm consistency
       + 0.20·issue_health  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·pr_health     // merged ÷ total PRs█
◷ Health bands +

The colour and label on every card come straight from the health score.

Healthy   80 – 100   active, responsive, regular releases
Stable    60 – 79    maintained, steady, no alarms
Quiet     40 – 59    slowing down — watch this one
At Risk    0 – 39    going dark · candidate for rescue█
// Tags — what each label means +

Tags are independent behavioral signals computed nightly. A project can hold multiple at once. They drive the home page sections.

solo_builder      one person holds > 80% of commits (last 180d)
needs_contributors has open "help wanted" or "good first issue" labels
hidden_gem        < 100 stars · active in last 3 months · documented
legacy_hero       repo > 5 years old · committed this year
fork_magnet       forks/stars > 0.5 · used as template or dependency
release_machine   5+ releases in the last 90 days
under_pressure    > 10 open issues · ≤ 2 contributors · health ≥ 60
community_watch   watchers > stars · devs tracking before the public
community_hub     GitHub Discussions enabled · > 20 discussions
funded            maintainer has active funding channel█
★ Why rank against stars at all? +

Stars are an outcome, not effort. A project with 8 stars and daily commits is doing more interesting work than one coasting on 8k. We measure the building, then divide by the attention already received — so the genuinely undervalued rise to the top.

// stars   = lagging indicator
// commits = leading indicator
// we rank by the leading one█