// readme

CBETA 電子佛典閱讀器 2 (非官方)

特色

Table of contents search, full-text search, bookmarks, URL sharing, offline browsing, text-to-speech playback, Buddhist dictionary, theme switching, sutra tabs, font adjustment, Kaishu (regular script) font, vertical text, printing sutras / copying-scripture booklets, online/offline DB support, cross-platform, ad-free, open source.

說明

CBETA 電子佛典閱讀器 2 (非官方) (Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association Reader 2), abbreviated cbetar2. It accesses electronic Buddhist scriptures using the CBETA API online or offline CBETA sutra files, and supports the following features:

  • 搜尋、瀏覽(線上查詢)
    1. Search the catalog: On the catalog page, press the magnifying glass icon at the top right. Enter part (or all) of a sutra title in the dialog, then press “搜索目錄” (Search catalog) to list related sutras.

    2. Full-text search: Similar to “Search catalog”, but in the dialog you can enter a passage from within a volume of a sutra, such as “大水忽起卒至無期” (a sample passage).

    3. Search within a sutra.

    4. Switching between volumes: On a sutra page, press the semi-transparent button at the bottom right, and a button appears that…

↑ The Undervalued Score +

How much a project earns versus how much attention it actually gets. Above 50 means the work is outrunning its audience. Recomputed nightly from commit velocity, contributor effort, issue resolution, fork utility, release cadence, and project maturity — divided by a logarithmic reach factor.

score  = signal / reach

signal = 0.25·commit_velocity   // commits in last 90 days (cap 30)
       + 0.20·contributor_work  // unique authors × velocity (cap 100)
       + 0.20·issue_resolution  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·fork_ratio        // forks ÷ stars (proxy for real usage)
       + 0.10·release_cadence   // releases in 90 days (cap 3)
       + age_bonus              // +0 to +0.30 after 6 months
       + homepage_bonus         // +0.05 if homepage is set

reach  = log₁₀(stars + watchers + 10)█
♥ The Health Score +

Is the project alive and maintained right now? A 0–100 pulse recomputed nightly from commit recency, rhythm, how fast issues close, and how quickly PRs get merged.

health = 0.35·recency       // days since last commit (90d decay)
       + 0.25·cadence       // commit rhythm consistency
       + 0.20·issue_health  // closed ÷ total issues
       + 0.20·pr_health     // merged ÷ total PRs█
◷ Health bands +

The colour and label on every card come straight from the health score.

Healthy   80 – 100   active, responsive, regular releases
Stable    60 – 79    maintained, steady, no alarms
Quiet     40 – 59    slowing down — watch this one
At Risk    0 – 39    going dark · candidate for rescue█
// Tags — what each label means +

Tags are independent behavioral signals computed nightly. A project can hold multiple at once. They drive the home page sections.

solo_builder      one person holds > 80% of commits (last 180d)
needs_contributors has open "help wanted" or "good first issue" labels
hidden_gem        < 100 stars · active in last 3 months · documented
legacy_hero       repo > 5 years old · committed this year
fork_magnet       forks/stars > 0.5 · used as template or dependency
release_machine   5+ releases in the last 90 days
under_pressure    > 10 open issues · ≤ 2 contributors · health ≥ 60
community_watch   watchers > stars · devs tracking before the public
community_hub     GitHub Discussions enabled · > 20 discussions
funded            maintainer has active funding channel█
★ Why rank against stars at all? +

Stars are an outcome, not effort. A project with 8 stars and daily commits is doing more interesting work than one coasting on 8k. We measure the building, then divide by the attention already received — so the genuinely undervalued rise to the top.

// stars   = lagging indicator
// commits = leading indicator
// we rank by the leading one█